|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011年10 期
| 標(biāo)題 |
| 深水中主墩圍堰施工方案比選研究(51 卷) |
| 英文標(biāo)題 |
| Study on comparison and selection of construction schemes of cofferdam for casting main pier in deep water |
| 摘要 |
| 結(jié)合珠江特大橋22#及23#墩所處的環(huán)境條件，對鋼筋混凝土圍堰和鋼圍堰的施工方案進(jìn)行了工期、施工安全和經(jīng)濟(jì)上的比較。結(jié)果表明，鋼圍堰比鋼筋混凝土圍堰工期短、費用低，經(jīng)計算驗證滿足要求，且實際工程中應(yīng)用效果較好，為類似施工方案的比選提供了有益的經(jīng)驗。 |
| 作者 |
| 新聞作者:粟學(xué)平，馬亞飛 |
| 關(guān)鍵字 |
