|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010年12 期
| 標題 |
| 筏板式與樁帽式CFG樁數(shù)值對比分析(50 卷) |
| 英文標題 |
| Numerical comparative analysis between raft-type and capped-type CFG (Cement Fly-ash Gravel) piles |
| 摘要 |
| 從研究CFG樁復合地基的沉降出發(fā)，應用PLAXIS二維有限元分析軟件對新建鐵路曲阜站路基沉降進行了分析，比較了用帶樁帽和帶筏板的CFG樁加固地基后對地基沉降的影響。分析表明，兩種CFG樁復合地基的最終沉降相差較小，均能滿足設計要求。帶筏板和帶樁帽的CFG樁復合地基在坡腳處 |
| 作者 |
| 新聞作者:蔣宗全，曹玉新，馬耀先，曲宏略，朱浩波 |
| 關(guān)鍵字 |
