|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011年11 期
| 標題 |
| 兩種非線性曲線擬合在施工地面沉降預(yù)測中的應(yīng)用對比分析(51 卷) |
| 英文標題 |
| Comparative analysis on application of two methods of non-linear curve-fitting in prediction of construction-induced ground surface settlement |
| 摘要 |
| 基于現(xiàn)有的實測數(shù)據(jù)樣本，運用雙曲線法和指數(shù)曲線法對地面沉降進行預(yù)測，結(jié)合三種不同的工程實例進行驗證并對預(yù)測結(jié)果作對比分析。兩種預(yù)測方法都能滿足工程精度的要求，且雙曲線法要比指數(shù)曲線法預(yù)測精度高。指數(shù)曲線預(yù)測的結(jié)果一般比實測結(jié)果要小，雙曲線法預(yù)測的結(jié)果相對 |
| 作者 |
| 新聞作者:王躍偉，張玲玲，石朋飛，蔣國盛 |
| 關(guān)鍵字 |
